Comments on this page:
Comment posted by BraltyCeagree, 12/24/2013 at 12:24am (UTC): hello |
Comment posted by ivo, 11/05/2013 at 6:03am (UTC): na koga staviti juventus ili real |
Comment posted by dreago, 04/21/2012 at 9:52am (UTC): le na kaj pa naj bi dANES STAVU |
Comment posted by Simone, 03/26/2012 at 3:18am (UTC): Apr25paulklos I would beg to differ. Sure the muebnrs are the muebnrs and I bet if you had the data you could show Persia beats small Greek polis 99.9% percent of the day and that Marathon happens The reality is Vancouver did not loose just games four and five they got hammered (and its not like the 3 wins bot blow-outs), and its not like the media is dredging up some 1970 s era Hawk's run of victory over the nuck's, but recent history that involves many of the current team(s) members.People remain people and not math models. On balance I agree if I was writing this 15 hours ago I would agree that Vancouver still had the better record and 2 chances to Chicago's 1 to win so still likely advances on math but once the Hawks won a second decisive win and going home I would not make that bet. |
Comment posted by dsadas, 11/28/2010 at 11:08am (UTC): das |
|